International
Tables for Crystallography Volume A Spacegroup symmetry Edited by M. I. Aroyo © International Union of Crystallography 2016 
International Tables for Crystallography (2016). Vol. A, ch. 3.6, pp. 852857
Section 3.6.2. Survey of magnetic subperiodic groups and magnetic space groups^{a}Department of Physics, The Eberly College of Science, Penn State – Berks Campus, The Pennsylvania State University, PO Box 7009, Reading, PA 19610–6009, USA 
We review the concept of a reduced magnetic superfamily (Opechowski, 1986) to provide a classification scheme for magnetic groups. This is used to obtain the survey of the two and threedimensional magnetic subperiodic group types and the one, two and threedimensional magnetic space groups given in Litvin (2013). In that survey a specification of a single representative group from each group type is provided.
Let denote a crystallographic group. The magnetic superfamily of consists of the following set of groups:
The third subset is divided into two subdivisions:

Two magnetic groups and are called equivalent if there exists an affine transformation that maps onto and onto (Opechowski, 1986). If only nonequivalent groups are included, then the above set of groups is referred to as the reduced magnetic superfamily of .
Example
We consider the crystallographic point group . The magnetic superfamily of the group consists of five groups: , the group , and the three groups , and . Since the latter three groups are all equivalent, the reduced magnetic superfamily of the group consists of only three groups: , , and one of the three groups , and .
Example
In the reduced magnetic space group superfamily of there are five groups: , , and three groups , and . The groups and are equitranslational magnetic space groups and is an equiclass magnetic space group .
A magnetic group has been defined as a symmetry group of a spin arrangement (Opechowski, 1986). With this definition, since , a group is then not a magnetic group. However, there is not universal agreement on the definition or usage of the term magnetic group. Two definitions (Opechowski, 1986) have magnetic groups as symmetry groups of spin arrangements, with one having only groups , of the three types of groups , and , defined as magnetic groups, while a second having both group and defined as magnetic groups. Here we shall refer to all groups in a magnetic superfamily of a group as magnetic groups, while cognizant of the fact that groups cannot be a symmetry group of a spin arrangement.
The survey consists of listing the reduced magnetic superfamily of one group from each type of one, two and threedimensional crystallographic point groups, two and threedimensional crystallographic subperiodic groups, and one, two and threedimensional space groups (Litvin, 1999, 2001, 2013). The numbers of types of groups , and in the reduced superfamilies of these groups is given in Table 3.6.2.1. The one group from each type, called the representative group of that type, is specified by giving a symbol for its translational subgroup and listing a set of coset representatives, called the standard set of coset representatives, of the decomposition of the group with respect to its translational subgroup. The survey provides the following information for each magnetic group type and its associated representative group:

Examples of entries in the survey of magnetic groups are given in Table 3.6.2.2. The survey of the threedimensional magnetic space groups (Litvin, 2001, 2013) was incorporated into the survey of threedimensional magnetic space groups given by Stokes & Campbell (2009) and the coset representatives can also be found on the Bilbao Crystallographic Server (http://www.cryst.ehu.es ; Aroyo et al., 2006).

For each set of magnetic group types, one, two and threedimensional crystallographic magnetic point groups, magnetic subperiodic groups and magnetic space groups, a separate numbering system is used. A threepart composite number N_{1}.N_{2}.N_{3} is given in the first column, see Table 3.6.2.2. N_{1} is a sequential number for the group type to which belongs. N_{2} is a sequential numbering of the magnetic group types of the reduced magnetic superfamily of . Group types always have the assigned number N_{1}.1.N_{3}, and group types the assigned number N_{1}.2.N_{3}. N_{3} is a global sequential numbering for each set of magnetic group types. The sequential numbering N_{1} for subperiodic groups and space groups follows the numbering in IT E and IT A, respectively.
A Hermann–Mauguinlike type symbol is given for each magnetic group type in the second column. This symbol denotes both the group type and the representative group of that type. For example, the symbol for the threedimensional magnetic spacegroup type 25.4.158 is . This symbol denotes both the group type, which consists of an infinite set of groups, and the representative group . While this representative group may be referred to as `the group ', other groups of this group type, e.g. , will always be written with subindices. The representative group of the magnetic group type is defined by its translational subgroup, implied by the first letter in the magnetic group type symbol and defined in Table 1.1 of Litvin (2013), and a given set of coset representatives, called the standard set of coset representatives, of the representative group with respect to its translational subgroup.
Only the relative lengths and mutual orientations of the translation vectors of the translational subgroup are given, see Table 1.2 of Litvin (2013). The symmetry directions of symmetry operations represented by characters in the Hermann–Mauguin symbols are implied by the character's position in the symbol and are given in Table 1.3 of Litvin (2013). The standard set of coset representatives are given with respect to an implied coordinate system. The absolute lengths of translation vectors, the position in space of the origin of the coordinate system and the orientation in that space of the basis vectors of that coordinate system are not explicitly given.
The standard set of coset representatives of each representative group is listed on the righthand side of the survey of magnetic group types, see e.g. Table 3.6.2.2. Each coset in the standard set of coset representatives is given in Seitz notation (Seitz, 1934, 1935a,b, 1936), i.e. {R∣τ} or {R∣τ}′. R denotes a proper or improper rotation (rotationinversion), τ a nonprimitive translation with respect to the nonprimed translational subgroup of the magnetic group, and the prime denotes that {R∣τ} is coupled with time inversion. The subindex notation on R, denoting the orientation of the proper or improper rotation, is given in Table 1.4 of Litvin (2013). [Note that the Seitz notation used in Litvin (2013) predates and is different from the IUCr standard convention for Seitz symbolism, see Section 1.4.2.2 and Glazer et al. (2014).]
3.6.2.2.4. Opechowski–Guccione magnetic group type symbols and the standard set of coset representatives
The specification of the magnetic group type symbol and the standard set of coset representatives of the magnetic group type's representative group is based on the conventions introduced by Opechowski and Guccione (Opechowski & Guccione, 1965; Opechowski, 1986) for threedimensional magnetic space groups. The specification was made in conjunction with Volume I of International Tables for Xray Crystallography (1969) (abbreviated here as ITXC I). One finds in ITXC I, for each group type , a specification of the coordinate system used, and, in terms of that coordinate system, a specification of the subgroup of translations of the representative space group of that group type, and also indirectly a specification of a set of coset representatives of of that representative group of group type . These coset representatives are uniquely determined from the coordinate triplets of the explicitly printed general position of the space group. The symbol for the space group is taken to be the spacegroup symbol at the top of the page listing these coordinate triplets. The symbol for a group type is that of the group type followed by , and the coset representatives of the representative group of the group type consist of the set of coset representatives of and this set multiplied by .
Example
In ITXC I, on the page for one finds the following coordinate triplets of the general position:determining the coset representative of the representative group :The coset representatives of the representative group are then:
ITXC I has been replaced by IT A. Ones finds that, for some space groups, the set of coordinate triplets of the general positions explicitly printed in IT A differs from that explicitly printed in ITXC I. As a consequence, if one attempts to interpret the Opechowski–Guccione symbols (OG symbols) for magnetic groups using IT A, one will, in many cases misinterpret the meaning of the symbol (Litvin, 1997, 1998). [It was suggested in these two papers that the original set of OG symbols should be modified so one could correctly interpret them using IT A instead of ITXC I. Adopting this illadvised suggestion would have required in the future a new modification of the OG symbols whenever changes were made to the choices of coordinate triplets of the general position in IT A. Consequently, the meaning of the original OG symbols was specified by Litvin (2001) by explicitly giving the coset representatives of the representative groups of each threedimensional magnetic space group.]
The symbol for a magnetic group type and its representative group is based on the symbol for the group type . is an equitranslational subgroup of , i.e. the translational subgroup of the magnetic group is , the translational subgroup of . The translational part of the group type symbol of an group is then the same as that of the group type . A number or letter in the remaining part of the symbol of appears unchanged in the symbol for if it is associated with a coset representative of the representative group that is also an element contained in the subgroup of . If not in , i.e. if in , the number or letter appears in the symbol for with a prime to denote that the element in is coupled with .
Example
The orthorhombic spacegroup type has the magnetic spacegroup type number 29.1.198. The representative group is defined by a orthorhombic translational subgroup denoted by the letter P in Pca2_{1} and the standard set of coset representativesThe magnetic spacegroup type 29.5.202 is a group whose symbol is . In this case we have , i.e. and . The symbol `2_{1}' in the symbol for refers to the coset representative {2_{001}∣0, 0, ½}, an element in . Consequently, the symbol `2_{1}' appears unprimed in the symbol for () and the coset representative {2_{001}∣0, 0, ½} appears as an unprimed coset representative in the standard set of coset representatives of . The symbols `c' and `a' in refer to the coset representatives {m_{100}∣½, 0, ½} and {m_{010}∣½, 0, 0}, respectively, neither of which are contained in . Consequently, both symbols appear primed in the symbol for and the coset representatives {m_{100}∣½, 0, ½} and {m_{010}∣½, 0, 0} appear as primed coset representatives in the standard set of coset representatives of . The representative magnetic space group then has the orthorhombic translational subgroup denoted by the letter P and the standard set of coset representatives
The symbol for a group type and its representative group is also based on the symbol for the group . [This is in contradistinction to the BNS symbols of groups (Belov et al., 1957), where the symbol for an group type is based on the symbol for the group , see Section 3.6.4.] As this is an equiclass magnetic group, half the translations of are now coupled with in and half the translations remain unprimed in . The unprimed translations constitute the translational subgroup of . We can then write the coset decomposition of the translational subgroup of with respect to the translational subgroup of aswhere denotes a chosen coset representative, a translation of which appears primed (coupled with ) in . The translational subgroup of can then be written asSymbols for the translational groups , the translational subgroups of , the translational groups of and the choice of the translations are given in Fig. 1 of Litvin (2013).
The symbol for a magnetic group type and its representative group is based on the symbol of the group type , and is also a symbol for the subgroup of unprimed elements: the translational part of the symbol of is replaced by the symbol for the translational subgroup of . If a coset representative {R∣τ(R)} of in appears as the coset representative {R∣τ(R) + t_{α}} of in , then the number or letter corresponding to {R∣τ(R)} in the symbol for is primed. If {R∣τ(R)} appears unchanged as a coset representative of in , then the number or letter corresponding to {R∣τ(R)} in the symbol for is unchanged (Opechowski & Litvin, 1977). The resulting symbol is a symbol for based on the symbol for and is also a symbol for the magnetic group : the symbol specifies not only but also ; by deleting the subindex on the translational part of the symbol and the primes on the rotational part, one obtains the symbol specifying . Having specified and , one has specified the group .
Example
Consider again the group 29.1.198, , whereThe symbol for the group type 29.7.204 is and is based on the symbol for . The translational subgroup of is given by the symbol P_{2b} where = {1∣0, 1, 0}, i.e. is generated by the three translations {1∣1, 0, 0}, {1∣0, 2, 0} and {1∣0, 0, 1} of , and the translational subgroup of is given by . The two primed symbols and in refer to the fact that the two coset representatives {m_{100}∣½, 0, ½} and {m_{010}∣½, 0, 0} that appear in the set of standard coset representatives of in appear as the coset representatives {m_{100}∣½, 1, ½} and {m_{010}∣½, 1, 0} in the set of standard coset representatives of in . As the symbol 2_{1} in is not primed, the coset representative {2_{001}∣0, 0, ½} of in remains unchanged as a coset representative of in . We have then the subgroupWe note that these same coset representatives of in are also the coset representatives of the standard set of coset representatives of in .and the standard set of coset representatives of listed in the tables is the same set of coset representatives:Since , it follows that andConsequently, a primed number or letter in the symbol for (which is also a symbol for ) denotes that the corresponding coset representative appears in coupled with and primed in , e.g. in denotes that the coset {m_{100}∣½, 0, ½} appears as {m_{100}∣½, 1, ½} in and as {m_{100}∣½, 0, ½}′ in . An unprimed number or letter in the symbol for (which is also a symbol for ) denotes that the corresponding element appears unchanged in and coupled with and primed in , the symbol 2_{1} in denotes that {2_{001}∣0, 0, ½} is in and {2_{001}∣1, 0, ½}′ is in .
For twodimensional magnetic space groups with square and hexagonal lattices, threedimensional magnetic space groups with tetragonal, hexagonal, rhombohedral and cubic lattices, and magnetic layer and rod groups with tetragonal, trigonal or hexagonal lattices, each letter or number in the group type symbol may represent not a single symmetry direction but a set of symmetry directions, see Table 1.3 in Litvin (2013), Table 2.1.3.1 in the present volume and Table 1.2.4.1 in IT E. Stokes & Campbell (2009) have pointed out that this can lead to not being able to determine the standard set of coset representatives in groups from the Opechowski–Guccione magnetic group symbol. Consequently, we introduce the convention that in determining the standard set of coset representatives, each letter or number in the group type symbol in these groups refers to the first symmetry direction of each set of symmetry directions listed in the aforementioned tables.
Example
The standard set of coset representatives of 94.1.786 P4_{2}2_{1}2 isFor the threedimensional magnetic group 94.7.792 , the standard set of coset representatives isThe secondary position in the Hermann–Mauguin symbol denotes the set of symmetry directions {[100], [010]}. With this convention, the primed symbol denotes that the corresponding coset representative {2_{100}∣½, ½, ½} of P4_{2}2_{1}2 appears in the coset representatives of coupled with the translation = {1∣0, 0, 1}. The third position in the Hermann–Mauguin symbol denotes the set of symmetry directions . The unprimed symbol 2 denotes that the coset representative of P4_{2}2_{1}2 appears unchanged in the coset representatives of .
The impact of this convention is that nine Opechowski–Guccione symbols of threedimensional magnetic space groups need to be changed:

To have all group symbols represent subgroups , six symbols for threedimensional magnetic space groups were based (Opechowski & Guccione, 1965) on the symbol of the subgroup instead of the symbol for . These are the groups 144.3.1236 P_{2c}3_{2}, 145.3.1239 P_{2c}3_{1}, 151.4.1262 P_{2c}3_{2}12, 152.4.1266 P_{2c}3_{2}21, 153.4.1270 P_{2c}3_{1}12 and 154.4.1274 P_{2c}3_{1}21. Additional groups are the rod groups 43.3.231 , 44.3.234 , 47.4.246 and 48.4.250 .
For magnetic group types , the magnetic group type symbol of the subgroup is given in the third column of the survey of magnetic groups, see e.g. Table 3.6.2.2. If is a group , then the subgroup is defined by the translational group of and the unprimed coset representatives of .
Example
Consider the threedimensional magnetic spacegroup type 16.3.101 . The representative group is defined by the translational subgroup denoted by the letter P generated by the translationsand the standard set of coset representativesThe subgroup of index 2 of the representative group is defined by the translational group denoted by the letter P and the cosets {1∣0} and {2_{001}∣0}, and is a group of type P2.
If is a group , then the subgroup is defined by the nonprimed translational group of and all the cosets of the standard set of coset representatives of the group .
Example
Consider the threedimensional magnetic spacegroup type 16.4.102 P_{2a}222. The representative group P_{2a}222 is defined by the translational group denoted by the symbol P_{2a} generated by the translationsand the standard set of coset representativesThe subgroup of index 2 of the representative group is defined by the translational subgroup denoted by the symbol P_{2a}, i.e. the translations generated byand the standard set of cosets of P_{2a}222. The group is a group of type P222.
While the group type symbol of is given, the coset representatives of the subgroup of derived from the standard set of coset representatives of may not be identical with the standard set of coset representatives of the representative group of type found in the survey of magnetic group types. Consequently, to show the relationship between this subgroup and the listed representative group of groups of type additional information is provided: a new coordinate system is defined in which the coset representatives of this subgroup are identical with the standard set of coset representatives listed for the representative group of groups of type : Let (O; a, b, c) be the coordinate system in which the group is defined. O is the origin of the coordinate system, and a, b and c are the basis vectors of the coordinate system. a, b and c represent a set of basis vectors of a primitive cell for primitive lattices and of a conventional cell for centred lattices. A second coordinate system, defined by (O + p; a′, b′, c′), is given in which the coset representatives of this subgroup are identical with the standard set of coset representatives listed for the representative group of groups of type . O + p is referred to as the location of the subgroup in the coordinate system of the group (Kopský, 2011). The origin is first translated from O to O + p. On translating the origin from O to O + p, a coset representative {R∣τ} becomes {R∣τ + Rp − p} (Litvin, 2005, 2008b; see also Section 1.5.2.3 ). This is followed by changing the basis vectors a, b and c to a′, b′ and c′, respectively. The basis vectors a′, b′, c′ define the conventional unit cell of the nonprimed subgroup of in the coordinate system (O; a, b, c) in which is defined. (O + p; a′, b′, c′) is given immediately following the group type symbol for the subgroup of . [In Litvin (2013), for typographical simplicity, the symbols `O +' are omitted.]
Example
For the threedimensional magnetic spacegroup type 10.4.52, , one finds in Litvin (2013)^{2}

The translational subgroup of the subgroup = P2 of is generated by the translations {1∣1, 0, 0}, {1∣0, 1, 0} and {1∣0, 0, 1} and the coset representatives of this group are {1∣0} and {2_{010}∣0}, the unprimed coset representatives on the right. This subgroup is of type P2. In Litvin (2013), listed for the group type 3.1.8, P2, one finds the identical two coset representatives. Consequently, there is no change in the coordinate system, i.e. and a′ = a, b′ = b and c′ = c. In the coordinate system of the magnetic group , the coset representatives of its subgroup are identical with the standard set of coset representatives of the group type P2.
Example
For the threedimensional magnetic spacegroup type 16.7.105, one has

The translational subgroup of the subgroup of is generated by the translations {1∣1, 0, 0}, {1∣0, 1, 0} and {1∣0, 0, 2}, and the coset representatives of this group are all those coset representatives on the right. This subgroup is of type P222_{1}. Listed for the group type 17.1.106 P222_{1}, one finds a different set of coset representatives:Consequently, to show the relationship between this subgroup of and the listed representative group of the group type P222_{1} we change the coordinate system in which is defined to (0, 0, 0; a, b, 2c). In this new coordinate system the coset representatives of the subgroup are identical with the coset representatives of the representative group of the group type P222_{1}.
Example
For the threedimensional magnetic spacegroup type 18.4.116, P2_{1}2_{1}′2′, one has

The translational subgroup of is generated by the translations {1∣1, 0, 0}, {1∣0, 1, 0} and {1∣0, 0, 1} and the coset representatives of this group are {1∣0} and {2_{100}∣½, ½, 0}, the unprimed coset representatives on the right. The group is of type P2_{1}. For the magnetic group type 4.1.15 P2_{1} one finds a different set of coset representatives: {1∣0} and {2_{010}∣0, ½, 0}. Consequently, to show the relationship between the subgroup of and the listed representative group of the group type P2_{1}, we change the coordinate system in which the subgroup is defined to (0, ¼, 0; c, a, b). The origin is first translated from O to O + p, where p = (0, ¼, 0), and then a new set of basis vectors, a′ = c, b′ = a and c′ = b, is defined. In this new coordinate system the coset representatives of the subgroup are identical with the standard set of coset representatives of the representative group of the group type P2_{1}.
References
International Tables for Xray Crystallography (1969). Vol. I, 3rd ed., edited by N. F. M. Henry & K. Lonsdale. Birmingham: Kynoch Press. [Earlier editions 1952, 1965.]Aroyo, M. I., PerezMato, J. M., Capillas, C., Kroumova, E., Ivantchev, S., Madariaga, G., Kirov, A. & Wondratschek, H. (2006). Bilbao Crystallographic Server I: Databases and crystallographic computing programs. Z. Kristallogr. 221, 15–27.
Belov, N. V., Neronova, N. N. & Smirnova, T. S. (1957). 1651 Shubnikov groups. Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 1, 487–488. See also (1955) Trudy Inst. Krist. Acad. SSSR, 11, 33–67 (in Russian), English translation in Shubnikov, A. V, Belov, N. V. & others (1964). Colored Symmetry. London: Pergamon Press.
Glazer, A. M., Aroyo, M. I. & Authier, A. (2014). Acta Cryst. A70, 300–302.
Kopský, V. (2011). Private communication.
Litvin, D. B. (1997). Changes in the Opechowski–Guccione symbols for magnetic space groups due to changes in the International Tables of Crystallography. Ferroelectrics, 204, 211–215.
Litvin, D. B. (1998). On Opechowski–Guccione magnetic spacegroup symbols. Acta Cryst. A54, 257–261.
Litvin, D. B. (1999). Magnetic subperiodic groups. Acta Cryst. A55, 963–964.
Litvin, D. B. (2001). Magnetic spacegroup types. Acta Cryst. A57, 729–730.
Litvin, D. B. (2005). Tables of properties of magnetic subperiodic groups. Acta Cryst. A61, 382–385.
Litvin, D. B. (2008b). Tables of crystallographic properties of magnetic space groups. Acta Cryst. A64, 419–424.
Litvin, D. B. (2013). Magnetic Group Tables, 1, 2 and 3Dimensional Magnetic Subperiodic Groups and Space Groups. Chester: International Union of Crystallography. Freely available from http://www.iucr.org/publ/978–0–9553602–2–0 .
Opechowski, W. (1986). Crystallographic and Metacrystallographic Groups. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Opechowski, W. & Guccione, R. (1965). Magnetic symmetry. In Magnetism, edited by G. T. Rado & H. Suhl, Vol. 2A, ch. 3. New York: Academic Press.
Opechowski, W. & Litvin, D. B. (1977). Error corrections corrected: A remark on Bertaut's article, Simple derivation of magnetic space groups. Ann. Phys. 2, 121–125.
Seitz, F. Z. (1934). A matrixalgebraic development of the crystallographic groups. Z. Kristallogr. 88, 433–459.
Seitz, F. Z. (1935a). A matrixalgebraic development of the crystallographic groups. Z. Kristallogr. 90, 289–313.
Seitz, F. Z. (1935b). A matrixalgebraic development of the crystallographic groups. Z. Kristallogr. 91, 336–366.
Seitz, F. Z. (1936). A matrixalgebraic development of the crystallographic groups. Z. Kristallogr. 94, 100–130.
Stokes, H. T. & Campbell, B. J. (2009). Table of magnetic space groups, http://stokes.byu.edu/magneticspacegroupshelp.html.