International
Tables for Crystallography Volume B Reciprocal space Edited by U. Shmueli © International Union of Crystallography 2006 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. B, ch. 5.1, pp. 537-538
Section 5.1.2.6. Propagation direction^{a}Laboratoire de Minéralogie-Cristallographie, Université P. et M. Curie, 4 Place Jussieu, F-75252 Paris CEDEX 05, France |
The energy of all the waves in a given wavefield propagates in a common direction, which is obtained by calculating either the group velocity or the Poynting vector [see Section A5.1.1.4, equation (A5.1.1.8) of the Appendix]. It can be shown that, averaged over time and the unit cell, the Poynting vector of a wavefield is where and are unit vectors in the and directions, respectively, c is the velocity of light and is the dielectric permittivity of a vacuum. This result was first shown by von Laue (1952) in the two-beam case and was generalized to the n-beam case by Kato (1958).
From (5.1.2.25) and equation (5.1.2.22) of the dispersion surface, it can be shown that the propagation direction of the wavefield lies along the normal to the dispersion surface at the tie point (Fig. 5.1.2.5). This result is also obtained by considering the group velocity of the wavefield (Ewald, 1958; Wagner, 1959). The angle α between the propagation direction and the lattice planes is given by
It should be noted that the propagation direction varies between and for both branches of the dispersion surface.
References
Ewald, P. P. (1958). Group velocity and phase velocity in X-ray crystal optics. Acta Cryst. 11, 888–891.Google ScholarKato, N. (1958). The flow of X-rays and material waves in an ideally perfect single crystal. Acta Cryst. 11, 885–887.Google Scholar
Laue, M. von (1952). Die Energie Strömung bei Röntgenstrahl interferenzen Kristallen. Acta Cryst. 5, 619–625.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. H. (1959). Group velocity and energy (or particle) flow density of waves in a periodic medium. Acta Cryst. 12, 345–346.Google Scholar