International
Tables for Crystallography Volume B Reciprocal space Edited by U. Shumeli © International Union of Crystallography 2010 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2010). Vol. B, ch. 3.1, p. 408
Section 3.1.11. Mean values^{a}Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Chemistry–Physics Building, Lexington, Kentucky 40506–0055, USA |
The weighted mean of a set of quantities iswhere the weights are typically chosen to minimize the variance of . The variance may be computed from the variance–covariance matrix M of the byMinimization of leads to weights given bywhere the components of vector v are all equal ( for all i and j); since (3.1.11.1) and (3.1.11.2) require only relative weights, we can assign for all i. Placing these weights in (3.1.11.2) yieldsFor the case of uncorrelated , the weights are inversely proportional to the corresponding variancesFor the case of two correlated variables,Derivation and discussion of these equations may be found in Sands (1966, 1982b).
The presence of systematic errors in the experimental data often results in these formulae producing estimates of the standard uncertainties of molecular dimensions that are too small; it has been suggested that such error estimates should be multiplied by 1.5 to make them more realistic (Taylor & Kennard, 1983). It is essential also that averages be computed only of similar quantities, and interatomic distances corresponding to different bond orders or different environments may not represent the same physical quantities; that is, there are reasons for the discrepancies, and averaging may obscure important information. Another source of error in molecular geometry parameters determined from crystallographic measurements is thermal motion, and distances should be corrected for such effects before making comparisons (Busing & Levy, 1964; Johnson, 1970, 1980).
A discussion of the appropriateness of weighted and unweighted means may be found in Taylor & Kennard (1985), which suggests that the unweighted mean might even be preferable if environmental effects are large.
References
Busing, W. R. & Levy, H. A. (1964). Effect of thermal motion on the estimation of bond lengths. Acta Cryst. 17, 142–146.Johnson, C. K. (1970). The effect of thermal motion on interatomic distances and angles. In Crystallographic Computing, edited by F. R. Ahmed, pp. 220–226. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
Johnson, C. K. (1980). Thermal motion analysis. In Computing in Crystallography, edited by R. Diamond, S. Ramaseshan & K. Venkatesan, pp. 14.01–14.19. Bangalore: Indian Academy of Sciences.
Sands, D. E. (1966). Transformations of variance–covariance tensors. Acta Cryst. 21, 868–872.
Sands, D. E. (1982b). Molecular geometry. In Computational Crystallography, edited by D. Sayre, pp. 421–429. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Taylor, R. & Kennard, O. (1983). The estimation of average molecular dimensions from crystallographic data. Acta Cryst. B39, 517–525.
Taylor, R. & Kennard, O. (1985). The estimation of average molecular dimensions. 2. Hypothesis testing with weighted and unweighted means. Acta Cryst. A41, 85–89.