Tables for
Volume B
Reciprocal space
Edited by U. Shmueli

International Tables for Crystallography (2010). Vol. B, ch. 3.4, pp. 450-452   | 1 | 2 |

Section 3.4.4. Preliminary derivation to obtain a formula which accelerates the convergence of an Rn sum over lattice points X(d)

D. E. Williamsa

aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA

3.4.4. Preliminary derivation to obtain a formula which accelerates the convergence of an Rn sum over lattice points X(d)

| top | pdf |

The three-dimensional direct-space crystal lattice is specified by the origin vectors [{\bf a}_{1}], [{\bf a}_{2}] and [{\bf a}_{3}]. A general vector in direct space is defined as[{\bf X(x)} = x_{1} {\bf a}_{1} + x_{2} {\bf a}_{2} + x_{3} {\bf a}_{3},]where [x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}] are the fractional cell coordinates of X. A lattice vector in direct space is defined as[{\bf X(d)} = d_{1} {\bf a}_{1} + d_{2} {\bf a}_{2} + d_{3} {\bf a}_{3},]where [d_{1}, d_{2}, d_{3}] are integers (specifying particular values of [x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}]) designating a lattice point. [V_{\rm d}] is the direct-cell volume which is equal to [{\bf a}_{1} \cdot {\bf a}_{2} \times {\bf a}_{3}]. A general point in the direct lattice is X(x); the contents of the lattice are by definition identical as the components of x are increased or decreased by integer amounts.

The reciprocal-lattice vectors are defined by the relations[\eqalign{ {\bf a}_{j} \cdot {\bf b}_{k} &= 1 \qquad j = k\cr &=0 \qquad j \neq k.}]A general vector in reciprocal space H(r) is defined as[{\bf H(r)} = r_{1} {\bf b}_{1} + r_{2} {\bf b}_{2} + r_{3} {\bf b}_{3}.]A reciprocal-lattice vector H(h) is defined by the integer triplet [h_{1}, h_{2}, h_{3}] (specifying particular values of [r_{1}, r_{2}, r_{3}]) so that[{\bf H(h)} = h_{1} {\bf b}_{1} + h_{2} {\bf b}_{2} + h_{3} {\bf b}_{3}.]In other sections of this volume a shortened notation h is used for the reciprocal-lattice vector. In this section the symbol H(h) is used to indicate that it is a particular value of H(r).

The three-dimensional Fourier transform [g({\bf t})] of a function [f({\bf x})] is defined by[g({\bf t}) = FT_{3} [\,f({\bf x})] = \textstyle\int f({\bf x}) \exp (2 \pi i {\bf x} \cdot {\bf t})\, \hbox{d}{\bf x}.]The Fourier transform of the set of points defining the direct lattice is the set of points defining the reciprocal lattice, scaled by the direct-cell volume. It is useful for our purpose to express the lattice transform in terms of the Dirac delta function [\delta (x - x_{\rm o})] which is defined so that for any function [f({\bf x})][f({\bf x}_{\rm o}) = \textstyle\int \delta ({\bf x} - {\bf x}_{\rm o}) f({\bf x})\, \hbox{d}{\bf x}.]We then write[FT_{3} \{{\textstyle\sum\limits_{\bf d}} \delta [{\bf X(x)} - {\bf X(d)}]\} = V_{\rm d}^{-1} {\textstyle\sum\limits_{\bf h}} \delta [{\bf H(r)} - {\bf H(h)}].]First consider the lattice sum over the direct-lattice points X(d), relative to a particular point [{\bf X(x)} = {\bf R}], with omission of the origin lattice point.[S'(n, {\bf R}) = {\textstyle\sum\limits_{{\bf d} \neq 0}} |{\bf X(d)} - {\bf R}|^{-n}.]The special case with [{\bf R} = 0] will also be needed:[S'(n, 0) = {\textstyle\sum\limits_{{\bf d} \neq 0}} |{\bf X(d)}|^{-n}.]Now define a sum of Dirac delta functions[f'[{\bf X(d)}] = {\textstyle\sum\limits_{d \neq 0}} \delta [{\bf X(x)} - {\bf X(d)}].]Then S′ can be represented as an integral[S'(n, {\bf R}) = \textstyle\int f'[{\bf X(d)}] |{\bf X - R}|^{-n}\, \hbox{d}{\bf X},]in which a term is contributed to S′ whenever the direct-space vector X coincides with the lattice vector X(d), except for [{\bf d} = 0]. Now apply the convergence function to S′:[\eqalign{ S'(n, {\bf R}) &= [\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} \textstyle\int f'[{\bf X(d)}]|{\bf X - R}|^{-n}\cr &\quad \times \Gamma (n/2, \pi w^{2} |{\bf X - R}|^{2})\, \hbox{d}{\bf X}\cr &\quad + [\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} \textstyle\int f'[{\bf X (d)}]|{\bf X - R}|^{-n}\cr &\quad \times \gamma (n/2, \pi w^{2} |{\bf X - R}|^{2})\, \hbox{d}{\bf X}.}]

The first integral is shown here only for the purpose of giving a consistent representation of S′; in fact, the first integral will be reconverted back into a sum and evaluated in direct space. The second integral will be transformed to reciprocal space using Parseval's theorem [see, for example, Arfken (1970[link])], which states that[\textstyle\int f ({\bf X}) g^{*} ({\bf X})\, \hbox{d}{\bf X} = \textstyle\int FT_{3} [\, f({\bf X})] FT_{3} [g^{*} ({\bf X})]\, \hbox{d}{\bf H}.]Considering only the second integral in the formula for S′ and explicitly introducing the [{\bf d} = 0] term we have[\eqalign{ &[\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} \textstyle\int f[{\bf X(d)}]| {\bf X (d) - R}|^{-n} \gamma (n/2, \pi w^{2}|{\bf X - R}|^{2})\, \hbox{d}{\bf X}\cr &\quad - [\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} \textstyle\int \delta ({\bf X})|{\bf R}|^{-n} \gamma (n/2, \pi w^{2} |{\bf R}|^{2})\, \hbox{d}{\bf X},}]where the unprimed f includes the [{\bf h} = 0] term which was earlier omitted from f′:[f({\bf X}) = {\textstyle\sum\limits_{\bf d}} \delta [{\bf X (x) - X(d)}].]Using Parseval's theorem, and evaluating the origin term, we have[\eqalign{ &[\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} \textstyle\int FT_{3} \{f [{\bf X(d)}]\} FT_{3}\cr &\quad \times [|{\bf X (d) - R}|^{-n} \gamma (n/2, \pi w^{2}|{\bf X - R}|^{2})]\, \hbox{d}{\bf H}\cr &\quad - [\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} |{\bf R}|^{-n} \gamma (n/2, \pi w^{2} |{\bf R}|^{2}).}]The Fourier transform of the complement of the incomplete gamma function divided by [|{\bf X}|^{n}] is (Nijboer & DeWette, 1957[link])[\eqalign{ &FT_{3} [\gamma (n/2, \pi w^{2} |{\bf X}|^{2}) |{\bf X}|^{-n}]\cr &\quad = \pi^{n - (3/2)} |{\bf H}|^{n-3} \Gamma [(-n/2) + (3/2), \pi w^{-2} |{\bf H}|^{2}].}]If there is a change of origin and the point [({\bf X} - {\bf R})] is used instead of X the transform is[\eqalign{ &FT_{3} [\gamma (n/2, \pi w^{2} |{\bf X - R}|^{2}) |{\bf X - R}|^{-n}]\cr &\quad = \pi^{n-(3/2)} |{\bf H}|^{n-3} \Gamma [(-n/2)\cr &\qquad + (3/2), \pi w^{-2} |{\bf H}|^{2}] \exp (2 \pi i{\bf H \cdot R}).}]Evaluation of the two Fourier transforms in the first term gives[\eqalign{ &[\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} \textstyle\int V_{\rm d}^{-1} {\textstyle\sum\limits_{\bf h}} \delta [{\bf H (h) - H}] \pi^{n-(3/2)} |{\bf H}|^{n-3}\cr &\quad\times \Gamma [(-n/2) + (3/2), \pi w^{-2} |{\bf H}|^{2}] \exp (2 \pi i{\bf H \cdot R})\, \hbox{d}{\bf H}.}]Because of the presence of the Dirac delta function in each integral, we can convert the integrals with h unequal to zero into a sum[\eqalign{ &[\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} V_{\rm d}^{-1} \pi^{n-(3/2)} {\textstyle\sum\limits_{h \neq 0}} |{\bf H (h)}|^{n-3}\cr &\quad \times \Gamma [(-n/2) + (3/2), \pi w^{-2} |{\bf H (h)}|^{2}] \exp [2 \pi i{\bf H(h) \cdot R}].}]The [{\bf h} = 0] term needs to be evaluated in the limit. Clearly, the complex exponential goes to unity. If n is greater than 3 the limit of the indeterminate form infinity/infinity is needed:[\eqalign{ &\lim\limits_{|{\bf H}| \rightarrow 0} {\Gamma [(-n/2) + (3/2), \pi w^{-2} |{\bf H}|^{2}]\over |{\bf H}|^{3-n}}\cr &\quad = \lim\limits_{|{\bf H}| \rightarrow 0} {\int_{\pi w^{-2} |{\bf H}|^{2}}^{\infty} t^{(-n/2)+(1/2)} \exp (-t)\, \hbox{d}t\over |{\bf H}|^{3-n}}.}]The limit can be found by L'Hospital's rule [see, for example, Widder (1961[link])] which states that if [f(x)] and [g(x)] both approach infinity as x approaches a constant, c, and the limit of the ratio of the first derivatives [f'(x)] and [g'(x)] exists, that limit is also true for the limit of the ratio of the functions:[\lim\limits_{x \rightarrow c} \ {f(x)\over g(x)} = \lim\limits_{x \rightarrow c} \ {f'(x)\over g'(x)}.]To differentiate the definite integral function, Leibnitz's formula may be used [see, for example, Arfken (1970[link])]. This formula states that[\eqalign{ {\hbox{d}\over\, \hbox{d}x} \int\limits_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t, x)\, \hbox{d}t &\ = \int\limits_{g(x)}^{h(x)} {\hbox{d}f (t, x)\over\, \hbox{d}x}\, \hbox{d}t\cr &\quad + f[h (x)] {\hbox{d}h(x)\over \hbox{d}x} - f[g(x)] {\hbox{d}g(x)\over\, \hbox{d}x}.}]In our case, x becomes [|{\bf H}|]; f becomes [t^{(-n/2)+(1/2)} \exp (-t)] which is independent of [|{\bf H}|]; g becomes [\pi w^{-2} |{\bf H}|^{2}]; and h is infinite. Thus only the last term of Leibnitz's formula is nonzero and we obtain for the ratio of the first derivatives[\eqalign{ &\lim\limits_{|{\bf H}| \rightarrow 0} {-(\pi w^{-2} |{\bf H}|^{2})^{(-n/2)+(1/2)} \exp (-\pi w^{2} |{\bf H}|^{2}) 2 \pi w^{-2} |{\bf H}|\over (3 - n) |{\bf H}|^{2-n}}\cr &\quad = \pi^{(-n/2)+(3/2)} w^{n-3} [2/(n-3)],}]so that the limiting value for the [{\bf h} = 0] term for n greater than 3 is[+ [\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} V_{\rm d}^{-1} \pi^{n/2} w^{n-3} [2/(n-3)].]The final result for S′ is[\eqalign{ S'(n, {\bf R}) &= [\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} {\textstyle\sum\limits_{{\bf d} \neq 0}} |{\bf X(d) - R}|^{-n}\cr &\quad \times \Gamma (n/2, \pi w^{2} |{\bf X(d) - R}|^{2})\cr &\quad - [\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} |{\bf R}|^{-n} \gamma (n/2, \pi w^{2} |{\bf R}|^{2})\cr &\quad + [\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} V_{\rm d}^{-1} \pi^{n - (3/2)} {\textstyle\sum\limits_{{\bf h} \neq 0}} |{\bf H (h)}|^{n-3}\cr &\quad \times \Gamma [(-n/2) + (3/2), \pi w^{-2} |{\bf H(h)}|^{2}]\cr &\quad \times \exp [2 \pi i{\bf H(h) \cdot R}]\cr &\quad + [\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} V_{\rm d}^{-1} \pi^{n/2} w^{n-3} 2(n - 3)^{-1}.}]

The significance of the terms is as follows. The first term represents the convergence-accelerated direct sum, which does not include the origin term; the next term, also in direct space, corrects for the remainder resulting from the subtraction of the origin term; the third term comes from Parseval's theorem and is a sum over the nonzero h reciprocal-lattice points; and the last term is the reciprocal-lattice [{\bf h} = 0] term.

If [{\bf R} = 0] the second term becomes an indeterminate form 0/0. The limit can be found with use of L'Hospital's rule again, this time for the 0/0 form. We need the limit of [f(x)/g(x)], where [f(R) = \gamma (n/2, \pi w^{2} R^{2})] and [g(R) = R^{n}]. To differentiate the incomplete gamma function, we can again use Leibnitz's formula. In this case only the second term of the formula is nonzero and we obtain for the ratio of the first derivatives[{2 \pi^{n/2} w^{n} |{\bf R}|^{n-1} \exp (- \pi w^{2}|{\bf R}|^{2})\over n |{\bf R}|^{n-1}},]so that the limiting value for this term as [|{\bf R}|] approaches zero is[-[\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} 2 \pi^{n/2} w^{n} n^{-1}.]Therefore, the value of the sum when [{\bf R} = 0] is[\eqalign{ S' (n,0) &= [\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} {\textstyle\sum\limits_{{\bf d} \neq 0}} |{\bf X(d)}|^{-n} \Gamma (n/2, \pi w^{2} |{\bf X(d)}|^{2})\cr &\quad - [\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} 2 \pi^{n/2} w^{n} n^{-1}\cr &\quad + [\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} V_{\rm d}^{-1} \pi^{n-(3/2)} {\textstyle\sum\limits_{{\bf h} \neq 0}} |{\bf H(h)}|^{n-3}\cr &\quad \times \Gamma [(-n/2) + (3/2), \pi w^{-2} |{\bf H(h)}|^{2}]\cr &\quad + [\Gamma (n/2)]^{-1} V_{\rm d}^{-1} \pi^{n/2} w^{n-3} 2(n - 3)^{-1}.}]


Arfken, G. (1970). Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.
Nijboer, B. R. A. & DeWette, F. W. (1957). On the calculation of lattice sums. Physica (Utrecht), 23, 309–321.
Widder, D. V. (1961). Advanced Calculus, 2nd ed. New York: Prentice-Hall.

to end of page
to top of page