International
Tables for Crystallography Volume C Mathematical, physical and chemical tables Edited by E. Prince © International Union of Crystallography 2006 
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. C, ch. 1.3, pp. 1014
doi: 10.1107/97809553602060000574 Chapter 1.3. Twinning
E. Koch^{a}
^{a}Institut für Mineralogie, Petrologie und Kristallographie, Universität Marburg, HansMeerweinStrasse, D35032 Marburg, Germany In Section 1.3.1, general terms with reference to twinning are explained. Subsequently, the terms `twin lattice' and `twin index' are defined and illustrated by several examples in Section 1.3.2 and the implication of twinning on the reflection pattern in reciprocal space is discussed in Section 1.3.3. Twinning by merohedry and by pseudomerohedry is described in Section 1.3.4. For each combination of point group and Bravais lattice, the possible twin operations for twins by merohedry are given in Table 1.3.4.1. Table 1.3.4.2 shows the simulated Laue classes, the extinction symbols, the simulated `possible space groups' and the possible true space groups for crystals twinned by merohedry. For cases in which the twin element cannot be recognized by direct inspection, a procedure for the calculation of the twin element is described in Section 1.3.5. 
A twin consists of two or more single crystals of the same species but in different orientation, its twin components. They are intergrown in such a way that at least some of their lattice directions are parallel. The twin law describes the geometrical relation between the twin components. It specifies a symmetry operation, the twin operation, that brings one of the twin components into parallel orientation with the other. The corresponding symmetry element is called the twin element.
There are several kinds of twin laws:
In many cases, there does not exist a unique twin law, but a twin may be described equally well by more than one twin law. (a) If the crystal structure of the twin components contains an evenfold rotation or screwrotation axis, an inversion twin cannot be distinguished from a reflection twin with twin plane perpendicular to that axis. (b) If the crystal structure contains a mirror or a glide plane, an inversion twin cannot be distinguished from a rotation twin with a twofold twin axis perpendicular to that plane. (c) If for a centrosymmetrical crystal structure the normal of a twin plane runs parallel to a lattice vector or a twin axis runs perpendicular to a net plane, the twin may be described equally well as a reflection twin or as a rotation twin.
The twin components are grown together in a surface called composition surface, twin interface or twin boundary. In most cases, the composition surfaces are lowenergy surfaces with good structural fit. For a reflection twin, it is usually a plane parallel to the twin plane. The composition surface of a rotation twin may either be a plane parallel to the twin axis or be a nonplanar surface with irregular shape.
If more than two components are twinned according to the same law, the twin is called a repeated twin or a multiple twin. If all the twin boundaries are parallel planes, it is a polysynthetic twin, otherwise it is called a cyclic twin. If the twin components are related to each other by more than one twin law, the shape and the mutual arrangement of the twin domains may be very irregular.
With respect to the formation process, one may distinguish between growth twins, transformation twins, and mechanical (deformation, glide) twins. Transformation twins result from phase transitions, e.g. of ferroelectric or ferromagnetic crystals. The corresponding twin domains are usually small and the number of such domains is high. Mechanical twinning is due to mechanical stress and may often be described in terms of shear of the crystal structure. This includes ferroelasticity.
Twins are observable by, for example, macroscopic or microscopic observation of reentrant angles between crystal faces, by etching, by means of different extinction positions for the twin components between cross polarizers of a polarization microscope, by different rotation angles of the plane of polarization of a beam of planepolarized light passing through the components of a twin showing optical activity, by a splitting of part of the Xray diffraction spots (except for twins by merohedry), by means of domain contrast or boundary contrast in an Xray topogram, or by investigation with a transmission electron microscope.
The phenomenon of twinning has frequently been described and discussed in the literature and it is impossible, therefore, to give a complete list of references. Further details may be learned, e.g. from a review article by Cahn (1954) or from appropriate textbooks. A comprehensive survey of Xray topography of twinned crystals is given by Klapper (1987). The following papers are related to twinning by merohedry or pseudomerohedry: Catti & Ferraris (1976), Grimmer (1984, 1989a, b), Grimmer & Warrington (1985), Donnay & Donnay (1974), Le Page, Donnay & Donnay (1984), Hahn (1981, 1984), Klapper, Hahn & Chung (1987), Flack (1987).
For reflection and rotation twins described in the last section, a special situation arises whenever there exists a lattice vector perpendicular to the twin plane or a lattice plane perpendicular to a rational twofold twin axis. Such a situation occurs systematically for all reflection and rotation twins with cubic symmetry and for certain twins with noncubic symmetry (cf. Table 1.3.2.1). In addition, such a perpendicularity may occur occasionally if equation (1.1.2.12 ) is satisfied.

In the case of a noncentrosymmetric crystal structure, different twins result from a twin axis [uvw] with a perpendicular lattice plane (hkl), or from a twin plane (hkl) with a perpendicular lattice row [uvw]: the reflection twin consists of two enantiomorphous twin components whereas the rotation twin is built up from two crystals with the same handedness (cf., for example, Brazil twins and Dauphiné twins of quartz). With respect to the first twin component, the lattice of the second component has the same orientation in both cases. For a centrosymmetrical crystal structure, both twin laws give rise to the same twin.
Whenever a twin plane or twin axis is perpendicular to a lattice vector or a net plane, respectively, the vector lattices of the twin components have a threedimensional subset in common. This sublattice [derivative lattice, cf. IT A (2005, Chapter 13.2 )] is called the twin lattice. It corresponds uniquely to the intersection group of the two translation groups referring to the twin components. The respective subgroup index i is called the twin index. It is equal to the ratio of the volumes of the primitive unit cells for the twin lattice and the crystal structure. If one subdivides the crystal lattice into nets parallel to the twin plane or perpendicular to the twin axis, each ith of these nets belongs to the common twin lattice of the two twin components (cf. Fig. 1.3.2.1 ). Important examples are cubic twins with [111] as twofold twin axis or (111) as twin plane and rhombohedral twins with [001] as twin axes or (001) as twin plane (hexagonal description). In all these cases, the twin index i equals 3.

(a) Projection of the lattices of the twin components of a monoclinic twinned crystal (unique axis c, γ = 93°) with twin index 3. The twin may be interpreted either as a rotation twin with twin axis [210] or as a reflection twin with twin plane (110). (b) Projection of the corresponding reciprocal lattices. 
For every twin lattice, its twin index i can be calculated from the Miller indices of the net plane (hkl) and the coprime coefficients u, v, w of the lattice vector t perpendicular to (hkl). Referred to a primitive lattice basis, i is simply related to the modulus of the scalar product j of the two vectors and : The same procedure – but with modified coefficients – may be applied to a centred lattice described with respect to a conventionally chosen basis: The coprime Miller indices h, k, l that characterize the net plane have to be replaced by larger noncoprime indices h′, k′, l′, if h, k, l do not refer to a (nonextinct) point of the reciprocal lattice. The integer coefficients u, v, w specifying the lattice vector perpendicular to (hkl) have to be replaced by smaller noninteger coefficients u′, v′, w′, if the centred lattice contains such a vector in the direction [uvw].

As shown above, the direct lattices of the components of any twin coincide in at least one row. The same is true for the corresponding reciprocal lattices. They coincide in all rows perpendicular to parallel net planes of the direct lattices.
For a reflection twin with twin plane (hkl), the reciprocal lattices of the twin components have only the lattice points with coefficients nh, nk, nl in common.
For a rotation twin with twofold twin axis [uvw], the reciprocal lattices of the twin components coincide in all points of the plane perpendicular to [uvw], i.e. in all points with coefficients h, k, l that fulfil the condition .
For a rotation twin with irrational twin axis parallel to a net plane (hkl), only reciprocallattice points with coefficients nh, nk, nl are common to both twin components.
As the entire direct lattices of the two twin components coincide for an inversion twin, the same must be true for their reciprocal lattices.
For a reflection or rotation twin with a twin lattice of index i, the corresponding reciprocal lattices, too, have a sublattice with index i in common (cf. Fig. 1.3.2.1b). In analogy to direct space, the twin lattice in reciprocal space consists of each ith lattice plane parallel to the twin plane or perpendicular to the twin axis. If the twin index equals 1, the entire reciprocal lattices of the twin components coincide.
If for a reflection twin there exists only a lattice row [uvw] that is almost (but not exactly) perpendicular to the twin plane (hkl), then the lattices of the two twin components nearly coincide in a threedimensional subset of lattice points. The corresponding misfit is described by the quantity , the twin obliquity. It is the angle between the lattice row [uvw] and the direction perpendicular to the twin plane (hkl). In an analogous way, the twin obliquity is defined for a rotation twin. If (hkl) is a net plane almost (but not exactly) perpendicular to the twin axis [uvw], then is the angle between [uvw] and the direction perpendicular to (hkl).
A twin is called a twin by merohedry if its twin operation belongs to the point group of its vector lattice, i.e. to the corresponding holohedry. As each lattice is centrosymmetric, an inversion twin is necessarily a twin by merohedry. Only crystals from merohedral (i.e. nonholohedral) point groups may form twins by merohedry; 159 out of the 230 types of space groups belong to merohedral point groups.
For a twin by merohedry, the vector lattices of all twin components coincide in direct and in reciprocal space. The twin index is 1. The maximal number of differently oriented twin components equals the subgroup index m of the point group of the crystal with respect to its holohedry.
Table 1.3.4.1 displays all possibilities for twinning by merohedry. For each holohedral point group (column 1), the types of Bravais lattices (column 2) and the corresponding merohedral point groups (column 3) are listed. Column 4 gives the subgroup index m of a merohedral point group in its holohedry. Column 5 shows m − 1 possible twin operations referring to the different twin components. These twin operations are not uniquely defined (except for point group 1), but may be chosen arbitrarily from the corresponding right coset of the crystal point group in its holohedry. It is always possible, however, to choose an inversion, a reflection, or a twofold rotation as twin operation.

A twin that is not a twin by merohedry as defined above but, because of metrical specialization, has a twin lattice with twin index 1 is called a twin by pseudomerohedry.
Two kinds of twins by merohedry may be distinguished.
Type 1: The twin can be described as an inversion twin. Then, only two twin components exist and the twin operation belongs to the Laue class of the crystal. As a consequence, the reciprocal lattices of the twin components are superimposed so that coinciding lattice points refer to Bragg reflections with the same values as long as Friedel's law is valid. In that case, no differences with respect to symmetry, or to reflection conditions, or to relative intensities occur between two sets of Bragg intensities measured from a single crystal on the one hand and from a twin on the other hand (whether or not the twin components differ in their volumes). If anomalous scattering is observed and the twin components differ in size, the intensities of Bragg reflections are changed in comparison with the untwinned crystal but the symmetry of the diffraction pattern is unchanged. For equal volumes of the twin components, however, the diffraction pattern is centrosymmetric again. The occurrence of anomalous scattering does not produce additional difficulties for spacegroup determination. The change of the Bragg intensities in comparison with the untwinned crystals, however, makes a structure determination more difficult.
Type 2: The twin operation does not belong to the Laue class of the crystal. Such twins can occur only in point groups marked by an asterisk in Table 1.3.4.1, i.e. in 55 out of the 159 types of space groups mentioned above. If the different twin components occur with equal volumes, the corresponding diffraction pattern shows enhanced symmetry. On the contrary, the reflection conditions are unchanged in comparison to those for a single crystal, except for . As a consequence, for 51 out of the 55 spacegroup types, the derivation of `possible space groups', as described in IT A (2005, Part 3 ), gives incorrect results. For , and , the combination of the simulated Laue class of the twin and the (unchanged) extinction symbol does not occur for single crystals. Therefore, the symmetry of these twins can be determined uniquely. In the case of , the reflection conditions differ for the two twin components. [This is because the holohedry of is whereas the Laue class of the Euclidean normalizer of is ; cf. IT A (2005, Part 15 ).] As a consequence, the reflection conditions for such a twinned crystal differ from all conditions that may be observed for single crystals (hkl cyclically permutable: 0kl only with k = 2n or l = 2n; 00l only with l = 2n) and, therefore, the true symmetry can be identified without uncertainty.
In Table 1.3.4.2, all simulated Laue classes (column 1) are listed that may be observed for twins by merohedry of type 2. Column 2 shows the corresponding extinction symbols. The symbols of the simulated `possible space groups' that follow from IT A (2005, Part 3 ) are gathered in column 3. The last column displays the symbols of those space groups which may be the true symmetry groups for twins by merohedry showing such diffraction patterns.

If the twin element cannot be recognized by direct macroscopic or microscopic inspection, it may be calculated as described below. Given are two analogous bases a, b, c and a′, b′, c′ referring to the two twin components. If possible, both basis systems should be chosen with the same handedness. If no such bases exist, the twin is a reflection twin and one of the bases has to be replaced by its centrosymmetrical one, e.g. a′, b′, c′ by −a′, −b′, −c′. The relation between the two bases is described by The coefficients e_{ij} have to be obtained by measurement.
Basis a, b, c may be mapped onto a′, b′, c′ by a pure rotation that brings a to a′, b to b′, and c to c′. To derive the direction of the rotation axis, calculate the three vectors a_{1}, b_{1}, c_{1} bisect the angles , , and , respectively. Calculate three further vectors of arbitrary length a_{2}, b_{2}, c_{2} which are perpendicular to the planes defined by a and a′, b and b′, and c and c′, respectively, from the scalar products The plane defined by a_{1} and a_{2} is perpendicular to the plane defined by a and a′ and bisects the angle . Analogous planes refer to b_{1} and b_{2}, and c_{1} and c_{2}. Vectors , , and lying within one of these planes may be described as linear combinations of a_{1} and a_{2}, b_{1} and b_{2}, or c_{1} and c_{2}, respectively: The common intersection line of these three planes is parallel to the twin axis. It may be calculated by solving any of the three equations : choose arbitrarily equal to 1. Solve the inhomogeneous system of three equations that corresponds to this vector equation for the three variables , , and . Calculate the vector . Its components with respect to a, b, c describe the direction of the twin axis.
The angle τ of the twin rotation may then be calculated by with .
If the basis a, b, c is orthogonal, τ may be obtained from If the coefficients of r are rational and τ equals 180°, then r describes the direction either of the twofold twin axis or of the normal of the twin plane. If r is rational and τ equals 60, 90 or 120°, r is parallel to the twin axis. If r is irrational, but τ equals 180° and there exists, in addition, a net plane perpendicular to r, this net plane describes the twin plane.
If none of these conditions is fulfilled, one has to repeat the calculations with a differently chosen basis system for one of the twin components. The number of possibilities for this choice depends on the lattice symmetry. The following list gives all equivalent basis systems for all descriptions of Bravais lattices used in IT A (2005):

References
Cahn, R. W. (1954). Twinned crystals. Adv. Phys. 3, 363–445.Catti, M. & Ferraris, G. (1976). Twinning by merohedry and Xray crystal structure determination. Acta Cryst. A32, 163–165.
Donnay, G. & Donnay, J. D. H. (1974). Classification of triperiodic twins. Can. Mineral. 12, 422–425.
Flack, H. D. (1987). The derivation of twin laws for (pseudo) merohedry by coset decomposition. Acta Cryst. A43, 564–568.
Grimmer, H. (1984). The generating function for coincidence site lattices in the cubic system. Acta Cryst. A40, 108–112.
Grimmer, H. (1989a). Systematic determination of coincidence orientations for all hexagonal lattices with axial ratios c/a in a given interval. Acta Cryst. A45, 320–325.
Grimmer, H. (1989b). Coincidence orientations of grains in rhombohedral materials. Acta Cryst. A45, 505–523.
Grimmer, H. & Warrington, D. H. (1985). Coincidence orientations of grains in hexagonal materials. J. Phys. (Paris), 46, C4, 231–236.
Hahn, Th. (1981). Meroedrische Zwillinge, Symmetrie, Domänen, Kristallstrukturbestimmung. Z. Kristallogr. 156, 114–115, and private communication.
Hahn, Th. (1984). Twin domains and twin boundaries. Acta Cryst. A40, C117.
International Tables for Crystallography (2005). Vol. A, Spacegroup symmetry, edited by Th. Hahn. Heidelberg: Springer.
Klapper, H. (1987). Xray topography of twinned crystals. Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. 14, 367–401.
Klapper, H., Hahn, Th. & Chung, S. J. (1987). Optical, pyroelectric and Xray topographic studies of twin domains and twin boundaries in KLiSO_{4}. Acta Cryst. B43, 147–159.
LePage, Y., Donnay, J. D. H. & Donnay, G. (1984). Printing sets of structure factors for coping with orientation ambiguities and possible twinning by merohedry. Acta Cryst. A40, 679–684.