International
Tables for Crystallography Volume C Mathematical, physical and chemical tables Edited by E. Prince © International Union of Crystallography 2006 
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. C, ch. 2.5, pp. 8487

Xray energydispersive diffraction, XED, invented in the late sixties (Giessen & Gordon, 1968; Buras, Chwaszczewska, Szarras & Szmid 1968), utilizes a primary Xray beam of polychromatic (`white') radiation. XED is the analogue of whitebeam and timeofflight neutron diffraction (cf. Section 2.5.2). In the case of powdered crystals, the photon energy (or wavelength) spectrum of the Xrays scattered through a fixed optimized angle is measured using a semiconductor detector connected to a multichannel pulseheight analyser. Singlecrystal methods have also been developed.
In XED powder work, the incident and scatteredbeam directions are determined by slits (Fig. 2.5.1.1). A powder spectrum is shown in Fig. 2.5.1.2. The Bragg equation is where d is the latticeplane spacing, the Bragg angle, λ and E the wavelength and the photon energy, respectively, associated with the Bragg reflection, h is Planck's constant and c the velocity of light. In practical units, equation (2.5.1.1a) can be written The main features of the XED powder method where it differs from standard angledispersive methods can be summarized as follows:
The scattering angle is chosen to accommodate an appropriate number of Bragg reflections within the available photonenergy range and to avoid overlapping with fluorescence lines from the sample and, when using an Xray tube, characteristic lines from the anode. Overlap can often be avoided because a change in the scattering angle shifts the diffraction lines to new energy positions, whereas the fluorescence lines always appear at the same energies. Severe overlap problems may be encountered when the sample contains several heavy elements.
The detector aperture usually collects only a small fraction of the Debye–Scherrer cone of diffracted Xrays. The collection of an entire cone of radiation greatly increases the intensities. Also, it makes it possible to overcome crystallite statistics problems and preferred orientations in very small samples (Holzapfel & May, 1982; Häusermann, 1992).
(a) Bremsstrahlung from an Xray tube. Bremsstrahlung from an Xray diffraction tube provides a useful continuous spectrum for XED in the photonenergy range 2–60 keV. However, one has to avoid spectral regions close to the characteristic lines of the anode material. A tungsten anode is suitable because of its high output of white radiation having no characteristic lines in the 12–58 keV range.
A drawback of Bremsstrahlung is that its spectral distribution is difficult to measure or calculate with accuracy, which is necessary for a structure determination using integrated intensities [see equation (2.5.1.7)]. Bremsstrahlung is strongly polarized for photon energies near the highenergy limit, while the lowenergy region has a weak polarization. The direction of polarization is parallel to the direction of the electron beam from the filament to the anode in the Xray tube. Also, the polarization is difficult to measure or calculate.
(b) Synchrotron radiation. Synchrotron radiation emitted by electrons or positrons, when passing the bending magnets or insertion devices, such as wigglers, of a storage ring, provides an intense smooth spectrum for XED.
Both the spectral distribution and the polarization of the synchrotron radiation can be calculated from the parameters of the storage ring. Synchrotron radiation is almost fully polarized in the electron or positron orbit plane, i.e. the horizontal plane, and inherently collimated in the vertical plane. Full advantage of these features can be obtained using a vertical scattering plane. However, the mechanical construction of the diffractometer, the placing of furnaces, cryogenic equipment, etc. are easier to handle when the Xray scattering is recorded in the horizontal plane. Recent XED facilities at synchrotronradiation sources have been described by Besson & Weill (1992), Clark (1992), Häusermann (1992), Olsen (1992), and Otto (1997).
The momentum resolution in energydispersive diffraction is limited by the angular divergence of the incident and diffracted Xray beams and by the energy resolution of the detector system. The observed profile is a convolution of the profile due to the angular divergence and the profile due to the detector response. For resolution calculations, it is usually assumed that the profiles are Gaussian, although the real profiles might exhibit geometrical and physical aberrations (Subsection 2.5.1.5). The relative full width at halfmaximum (FWHM) of a diffraction peak in terms of energy is then given by where is the electronic noise contribution, F the Fano factor, the energy required for creating an electron–hole pair (cf. Subsection 7.1.5.1 ), and the overall angular divergence of the Xray beam, resulting from a convolution of the incident and the diffractedbeam profiles. For synchrotron radiation, can usually be replaced by the divergence of the diffracted beam because of the small divergence of the incident beam.
Fig. 2.5.1.3 shows as a function of Bragg angle . The curves have been calculated from equations (2.5.1.1) and (2.5.1.2) for two values of the latticeplane spacing and two values of , typical for Bremsstrahlung and synchrotron radiation, respectively. It is seen that in all cases decreases with decreasing angle (i.e. increasing energy) to a certain minimum and then increases rapidly. It is also seen that the minimum point of the curve is lower for the small d value and shifts towards smaller values for decreasing . Calculations of this kind are valuable for optimizing the Bragg angle for a given sample and other experimental conditions (cf. Fukamachi, Hosoya & Terasaki, 1973; Buras, Niimura & Olsen, 1978).

Relative resolution, , as function of Bragg angle, , for two values of the lattice plane spacing: (a) 1 Å and (b) 0.5 Å. The full curves have been calculated for , the broken curves for . 
The relative peak width at halfheight is typically less than 1% for energies above 30 keV. When the observed peaks can be fitted with Gaussian functions, one can determine the centroids of the profiles by a factor of 10–100 better than the value of equation (2.5.1.2) would indicate. Thus, it should be possible to achieve a relative resolution of about 10^{−4} for high energies. A resolution of this order is required for example in residualstress measurements.
The detector broadening can be eliminated using a technique where the diffraction data are obtained by means of a scanning crystal monochromator and an energysensitive detector (Bourdillon, Glazer, Hidaka & Bordas, 1978; Parrish & Hart, 1987). A lowresolution detector is sufficient because its function (besides recording) is just to discriminate the monochromator harmonics. The Bragg reflections are not measured simultaneously as in standard XED. The monochromatorscan method can be useful when both a fixed scattering angle (e.g. for samples in special environments) and a high resolution are required.
The kinematical theory of diffraction and a nonabsorbing crystal with a `frozen' lattice are assumed. Corrections for thermal vibrations, absorption, extinction, etc. are discussed in Subsection 2.5.1.5. The total diffracted power, , for a Bragg reflection of a powder sample can then be written (Buras & Gerward, 1975; Kalman, 1979) where h is the diffraction vector, the classical electron radius, the intensity per unit energy range of the incident beam evaluated at the energy of the diffraction peak, V the irradiated sample volume, the number of unit cells per unit volume, j the multiplicity factor, F the structure factor, and the polarization factor. The latter is given by where P(E) is the degree of polarization of the incident beam. The definition of P(E) is where and are the parallel and normal components of with respect to the plane defined by the incident and diffractedbeam directions.
Generally, has to be calculated from equations (2.5.1.4) and (2.5.1.5). However, the following special cases are sometimes of interest: Equation (2.5.1.6a) can often be used in connection with Bremsstrahlung from an Xray tube. The primary Xray beam can be treated as unpolarized for all photon energies when there is an angle of 45° between the plane defined by the primary and the diffracted beams and the plane defined by the primary beam and the electron beam of the Xray tube. In standard configurations, the corresponding angle is 0° or 90° and equation (2.5.1.6a) is generally not correct. However, for it is correct to within 2.5% for all photon energies (Olsen, Buras, Jensen, Alstrup, Gerward & Selsmark, 1978).
Equations (2.5.1.6b) and (2.5.1.6c) are generally acceptable approximations for synchrotron radiation. Equation (2.5.1.6b) is used when the scattering plane is horizontal and (2.5.1.6c) when the scattering plane is vertical.
The diffraction directions appear as generatrices of a circular cone of semiapex angle about the direction of incidence. Equation (2.5.1.3) represents the total power associated with this cone. Generally, only a small fraction of this power is recorded by the detector. Thus, the useful quantity is the power per unit length of the diffraction circle on the receiving surface, . At a distance r from the sample, the circumference of the diffraction circle is and one has (constants omitted) The peak areas in an XED powder spectrum are directly proportional to the of equation (2.5.1.7).
Quantitative structural analysis requires the knowledge of and P(E). As mentioned above, these quantities are not known with sufficient accuracy for Bremsstrahlung. For synchrotron radiation they can be calculated, but they will nevertheless contribute to the total uncertainty in the analysis. Accordingly, XED is used rather for identification of a known or assumed structure than for a full structure determination.
(a) Temperature effects. The effect of thermal vibrations on the integrated intensities is expressed by the Debye–Waller factor in the same way as for standard angledispersive methods. Notice that irrespective of the method used. The contribution of the thermal diffuse scattering to the measured integrated intensities can be calculated if the elastic constants of the sample are known (Uno & Ishigaki 1975).
(b) Absorption. The transmission factor ) for a small sample bathed in the incident beam and the factor for a large sample intercepting the entire incident beam are the same as for monochromatic methods (Table 6.3.3.1 ). However, when they are applied to energydispersive techniques, one has to note that the absorption corrections are strongly varying with energy. In the special case of a symmetrical reflection where the incident and diffracted beams each make angles with the face of a thick sample (powder or imperfect crystal), one has where μ(E) is the linear attenuation coefficient evaluated at the energy associated with the Bragg reflection.
(c) Extinction and dispersion. Extinction and dispersion corrections are applied in the same way as for angledispersive monochromatic methods. However, in XED, the energy dependence of the corrections has to be taken into account.
(d) Geometrical aberrations. These are distortions and displacements of the line profile by features of the geometry of the apparatus. Axial aberrations as well as equatorial divergence contribute to the angular range of the Bragg reflections. There is a predominance of positive contributions to , so that the diffraction maxima are slightly displaced to the lowenergy side, and show more tailing on the lowenergy side than the highenergy side (Wilson, 1973).
(e) Physical aberrations. Displacements due to the energydependent absorption and reflectivity of the sample tend to cancel each other if the incident intensity, , can be assumed to be constant within the energy range of Bragg reflection. With synchrotron radiation, varies rapidly with energy and its influence on the peak positions should be checked. Also, the detector response function will influence the line profile. Lowenergy line shapes are particularly sensitive to the deadlayer absorption, which may cause tailing on the lowenergy side of the peak. Integrated intensities, measured as peak areas in the diffraction spectrum, have to be corrected for detector efficiency and intensity losses due to escape peaks.
The Rietveld method (see Chapter 8.6 ) for refining structural variables has only recently been applied to energydispersive powder data. The ability to analyse diffraction patterns with overlapping Bragg peaks is particularly important for a lowresolution technique, such as XED (Glazer, Hidaka & Bordas, 1978; Buras, Gerward, Glazer, Hidaka & Olsen, 1979; Neuling & Holzapfel, 1992). In this section, it is assumed that the diffraction peaks are Gaussian in energy. It then follows from equation (2.5.1.7) that the measured profile of the reflection k at energy corresponding to the ith channel of the multichannel analyser can be written where is a constant, is evaluated at the energy , and is the full width (in energy) at halfmaximum of the diffraction peak. is a factor that accounts for the absorption in the sample and elsewhere in the beam path. The number of overlapping peaks can be determined on the basis of their position and halfwidth. The full width at halfmaximum can be expressed as a linear function of energy: where U and V are the halfwidth parameters.
Energydispersive diffraction is mainly used for powdered crystals. However, it can also be applied to singlecrystal diffraction.
A twocircle system for singlecrystal diffraction in a diamondanvil highpressure cell with a polychromatic, synchrotron Xray beam has been devised by Mao, Jephcoat, Hemley, Finger, Zha, Hazen & Cox (1988).
Formulae for singlecrystal integrated intensities are well known from the classical Laue method. Adaptations to energydispersive work have been made by Buras, Olsen, Gerward, Selsmark & LindegaardAndersen (1975).
The unique features of energydispersive diffraction make it a complement to rather than a substitute for monochromatic angledispersive diffraction. Both techniques yield quantitative structural information, although XED is seldom used for a full structure determination. Because of the fixed geometry, energydispersive methods are particularly suited to in situ studies of samples in special environments, e.g. at high or low temperature and/or high pressure. The study of anomalous scattering and forbidden reflections is facilitated by the possibility of shifting the diffraction peaks on the energy scale by changing the scattering angle. Other applications are studies of Debye–Waller factors, determinative mineralogy, attenuationcoefficient measurements, onstream measurements, particlesize and strain determination, and texture studies. These and other applications can be found in an annotated bibliography covering the period 1968–1978 (Laine & Lähteenmäki, 1980). The short counting time and the simultaneous recording of the diffraction spectrum permit the study of the kinetics of structural transformations in time frames of a few seconds or minutes.
Energydispersive powder diffraction has proved to be of great value for highpressure structural studies in conjunction with synchrotron radiation. The brightness of the radiation source and the efficiency of the detector system permit the recording of a diffraction spectrum with satisfactory counting statistics in a reasonable time (100–1000 s) in spite of the extremely small sample volume (10^{−3}–10^{−5} mm^{3}). Reviews have been given by Buras & Gerward (1989) and Häusermann (1992). Recently, XED experiments have been performed at pressures above 400 GPa, and pressures near 1 TPa may be attainable in the near future (Ruoff, 1992). At this point, it should be mentioned that XED methods have limited resolution and generally give unreliable peak intensities. The situation has been transformed recently by the introduction of the imageplate area detector, which allows angledispersive, monochromatic methods to be used with greatly improved resolution and powder averaging (Nelmes & McMahon, 1994, and references therein).
References
Besson, J. M. & Weill, G. (1992). EDX station for high pressure at LURE (DCI). High Press. Res. 8, 715–716.Google ScholarBourdillon, A. J., Glazer, A. M., Hidaka, M. & Bordas, J. (1978). Highresolution energydispersive diffraction using synchrotron radiation. J. Appl. Cryst. 11, 684–687.Google Scholar
Buras, B., Chwaszczewska, J., Szarras, S. & Szmid, Z. (1968). Fixed angle scattering (FAS) method for Xray crystal structure analysis. Report No. 894/II/PS, 10 pp. Institute of Nuclear Research, Warsaw.Google Scholar
Buras, B. & Gerward, L. (1975). Relations between integrated intensities in crystal diffraction methods for Xrays and neutrons. Acta Cryst. A31, 372–374.Google Scholar
Buras, B. & Gerward, L. (1989). Application of Xray energydispersive diffraction for characterization of materials under high pressure. Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. 18, 93–138.Google Scholar
Buras, B., Gerward, L., Glazer, A. M., Hidaka, M. & Olsen, J. S. (1979). Quantitative structural studies by means of the energydispersive method with Xrays from a storage ring. J. Appl. Cryst. 12, 531–536.Google Scholar
Buras, B., Niimura, N. & Olsen, J. S. (1978). Optimum resolution in Xray energydispersive diffractometry. J. Appl. Cryst. 11, 137–140.Google Scholar
Buras, B., Olsen, J. S., Gerward, L., Selsmark, B. & LindegaardAndersen, A. (1975). Energydispersive spectroscopic methods applied to Xray diffraction in single crystals. Acta Cryst. A31, 327–333.Google Scholar
Clark, S. M. (1992). A new white beam single crystal and powder diffraction facility at the SRS. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 1010–1012.Google Scholar
Fukamachi, T., Hosoya, S. & Terasaki, O. (1973). The precision of interplanar distances measured by an energydispersive method. J. Appl. Cryst. 6, 117–122.Google Scholar
Giessen, B. C. & Gordon, G. E. (1968). Xray diffraction: new highspeed technique based on Xray spectroscopy. Science, 159, 973–975.Google Scholar
Glazer, A. M., Hidaka, M. & Bordas, J. (1978). Energydispersive powder profile refinement using synchrotron radiation. J. Appl. Cryst. 11, 165–172.Google Scholar
Häusermann, D. (1992). New techniques for new sources: a fresh look at energydispersive diffraction for highpressure studies. High Press. Res. 8, 647–654.Google Scholar
Holzapfel, W. B. & May, W. (1982). Improvements in energy dispersive Xray diffraction with conical slit and diamond cell. Highpressure research in geophysics, edited by S. Akimoto & M. H. Manghnani, pp. 73–80, and references therein. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Kalman, Z. H. (1979). On the derivation of integrated reflected energy formulae. Acta Cryst. A35, 634–641.Google Scholar
Laine, E. & Lähteenmäki, I. (1980). The energydispersive Xray diffraction method: annotated bibliography 1968–78. J. Mater. Sci. 15, 269–278, and references therein.Google Scholar
Mao, H. K., Jephcoat, A. P., Hemley, R. J., Finger, L. W., Zha, C. S., Hazen, R. M. & Cox, D. E. (1988). Synchrotron Xray diffraction measurements of single crystal hydrogen to 26.5 GigaPascals. Science, 239, 1131–1134.Google Scholar
Nelmes, R. J. & McMahon, M. I. (1994). Highpressure powder diffraction on synchrotron sources. J. Synchrotron Rad. 1, 69–73.Google Scholar
Neuling, H. W. & Holzapfel, W. B. (1992). Rietveld analysis for energy dispersive Xray diffraction under high pressure with synchrotron radiation. High Press. Res. 8, 665–660.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. S. (1992). Instrumentation for highpressure Xray diffraction research at HASYLAB. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 1058–1061.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. S., Buras, B., Jensen, T., Alstrup, O., Gerward, L. & Selsmark, B. (1978). Influence of polarization of the incident beam on integrated intensities in Xray energydispersive diffractometry. Acta Cryst. A34, 84–87.Google Scholar
Otto, J. W. (1997). A facility for highpressure Xray diffraction at HASYLAB. Nucl. Instrum. Methods, A384, 552–557.Google Scholar
Parrish, W. & Hart, M. (1987). Advantages of synchrotron radiation for polycrystalline diffractometry. Z. Kristallogr. 179, 161–173.Google Scholar
Ruoff, A. L. (1992). EDXD studies above 400 GPa (and prospects for obtaining pressures near 1 TPa and doing EDXD studies at such pressures). High Press. Res. 8, 639–645.Google Scholar
Uno, R. & Ishigaki, A. (1975). The correction of experimental structure factors for thermal diffuse scattering in white Xray diffraction. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 14, 291–292.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. J. C. (1973). Note on the aberrations of a fixedangle energydispersive powder diffractometer. J. Appl. Cryst. 6, 230–237.Google Scholar