International
Tables for Crystallography Volume C Mathematical, physical and chemical tables Edited by E. Prince © International Union of Crystallography 2006 
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. C, ch. 4.2, p. 195

The allowable power loading of Xray tube targets is determined by the temperature of the target surface, which must remain below the melting point. Müller (1927, 1929, 1931) first calculated the maximum loading both for stationary and for rotating anodes. His calculations were refined by Oosterkamp (1948a,b,c) who considered, in particular, targets of finite thickness, and who also treated pulsed operation of the tube. For normal conditions, Oosterkamp's conclusions and those of Ishimura, Shiraiwa & Sawada (1957) do not greatly differ from those of Müller, which are in adequate agreement with experimental observations.
For an elliptical focal spot with axes and , Müller's formula for the maximum power dissipation on a stationary anode, assumed to be a watercooled block of dimensions large compared with the focalspot dimensions, can be written where K is the specific thermal conductivity of the target material in W mm^{−1}, is the maximum temperature at the centre of the focal spot on the target, that is, a temperature well below the melting point of the target material, and is the temperature of the cold surface of the target, that is, of the cooling water. The function μ is shown in Fig. 4.2.1.4 . For copper, K is 400 W m^{−1} and, with = 500 K, For f_{2}/f_{1} = 0.1, and μ = 0.425, this equation becomes In these last two equations, f_{1} is in mm.

The function μ in Müller's equation (equation 4.2.1.12) as a function of the ratio of width to length of the focal spot. 
For a rotating target, Müller found that the permissible power dissipation was given by where f_{2} is the short dimension of the focus, assumed to be in the direction of motion of the target, v is the linear velocity, ρ is the density of the target material, and C is its specific heat.
For a copper target with f_{1} and f_{2} in mm and v in mm s^{−1}, Equation (4.2.1.16) shows that for very narrow focal spots rotatinganode tubes give useful improvements in permissible loading only if the surface speed is very high (see Table 4.2.1.3). The reason is that with large foci on stationary anodes the isothermal surfaces in the target are planar; with fine foci, these surfaces become cylindrical and this already makes for very efficient cooling without the need for rotation. Rotating anodes are thus most useful for mediumsize foci (200 to 500 μm) since for the larger focal spots it becomes very expensive to construct power supplies capable of supplying the permissible amount of power.
Table 4.2.1.3 shows the recommended loading for a number of commercially available Xray tubes with copper targets, which will be seen to be in qualitative agreement with the calculations. Some of the discrepancy is due to the fact that the value of for the copper–chromium alloy targets used in actual Xray tubes is appreciably lower than the value for pure copper used here. To a good approximation, the permissible loading for other targets can be derived by multiplying those in Table 4.2.1.3 by the factors shown in Table 4.2.1.4. It is worth noting that the recommended loading of commercial stationarytarget Xray tubes has increased steadily in recent years. This is largely due to improvements in the water cooling of the back surface of the target by increasing the turbulence of the water and the effective surface area of the cooled surface.

In considering Table 4.2.1.3, it should be noted that the linear velocities of the highestpower Xraytube anode have already reached a speed that Yoshimatsu & Kozaki (1977) consider the practical limit, which is set by the mechanical properties of engineering materials. It should also be noted that much higher specific loads can be achieved for true microfocus tubes, e.g. 50 kW mm^{−2} for a 25 μm Ehrenberg & Spear tube and 1000 kW mm^{−2} for a tube with a 1 μm focus (Goldsztaub, 1947; Cosslett & Nixon, 1951, 1960).
Some tubes with focus spots of less than 10 μm utilize foil or needle targets. These targets and the heat dissipated in them have been discussed by Cosslett & Nixon (1960). The dissipation is less than that in a massive target by a factor of about 3 for a foil and 10 for a needle, but, in view of the low absolute power, target movement and even watercooling can be dispensed with.
References
Cosslett, V. E. & Nixon, W. C. (1951). Xray shadow microscope. Nature (London), 168, 24–25.Google ScholarCosslett, V. E. & Nixon, W. C. (1960). Xray microscopy, pp. 217–222. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldsztaub, S. (1947). Tube à rayons X de grande brilliance à foyer ponctuel. C. R. Acad. Sci. 224, 458–459.Google Scholar
Ishimura, T., Shiraiwa, Y. & Sawada, M. (1957). The input power limit of the cylindrical rotating anode of an Xray tube. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 12, 1064–1070.Google Scholar
Müller, A. (1927). Input limits of Xray generators. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 117, 30–42.Google Scholar
Müller, A. (1929). A spinningtarget Xray generator and its input limit. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 125, 507–516.Google Scholar
Müller, A. (1931). Further estimates of the input limits of Xray generators. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 132, 646–649.Google Scholar
Oosterkamp, W. J. (1948a). The heat dissipation in the anode of an Xray tube. Philips Res. 3, 49–59.Google Scholar
Oosterkamp, W. J. (1948b). The heat dissipation in the anode of an Xray tube. Philips Res. 3, 161–173.Google Scholar
Oosterkamp, W. J. (1948c). The heat dissipation in the anode of an Xray tube. Philips Res. 3, 303–317.Google Scholar
Yoshimatsu, M. & Kozaki, S. (1977). Highbrilliance Xray sources. Xray optics, edited by H.J. Queisser, Chap. 2. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar