International
Tables for Crystallography Volume D Physical properties of crystals Edited by A. Authier © International Union of Crystallography 2006 
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. D, ch. 1.8, pp. 226227
Section 1.8.5. Seebeck coefficient^{a}Department of Physics, 104 Davey Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA 
The Seebeck coefficient S is the third transport coefficient that enters into the fundamental equations (1.8.2.1) and (1.8.2.2). Here we discuss some of its basic properties. First, we write down three integrals for the transport coefficients according to Goldsmid (1986): where is the chemical potential, e is the electron charge, , which we will call the transport distribution function, is given by where the summation is over the first Brillouin zone, is the group velocity of the carriers with wavevector in the direction of the applied field, is the lifetime of the carriers and is the dispersion relation for the carriers. In cases in which many bands contribute to the transport process, the summation has to be extended to all the bands. In some particular cases, such as for parabolic bands, the transport distribution defined in (1.8.5.5) takes a much simpler form: where is the density of states.
The Seebeck coefficient is defined in (1.8.5.2). Since the lefthand side of this equation contains , S is defined as the ratio of the two integrals in (1.8.5.1) and (1.8.5.2). The magnitude of the function is immaterial for S, since the magnitude cancels in the ratio. All that matters is the dependence of upon the energy . The function is a symmetric function of . Furthermore, it becomes very small when is more than a few thermal energies away from the chemical potential. The Seebeck coefficient depends upon how varies within this small energy range. The usual case is that it is a smooth function of that can be expanded in a Taylor series: The Seebeck coefficient has a linear dependence upon temperature. The coefficient of this term depends upon the energy variations in at the chemical potential. In most metals, a linear dependence upon temperature is observed (e.g. Rowe, 1995), particularly at high temperature. This linearity is found when one simple criterion is satisfied: that the function has a smooth dependence upon energy near the chemical potential.
Any deviation from linear behaviour in the Seebeck coefficient implies that the function has a more complicated behaviour near the chemical potential. Here we review several possible shapes. One is a simple Lorentzian peak: The peak of the Lorentzian is at and the width is . Fig. 1.8.5.1 shows the Seebeck coefficient calculated with this functional form. We arbitrarily took and . The four curves are for 10, 30, 100 and 300 K, and the larger has the larger Seebeck coefficient. All of the curves have a broad peak as a function of temperature. If , then , since the integrand is an odd function of . The vertical scale is where S_{0} = k_{B}/e = 86.17 µV K^{−1}. We see from Fig. 1.8.5.1 that it is difficult to get values of very much larger than unity.

The Seebeck coefficient S in units of for containing a Lorentzian peak. The values of S increase as the resonance energy increases away from the chemical potential. 
Another example is that of mixedvalence materials with f electrons. The f shells make electron states of narrow energy, which are approximated as Lorentzians. In this case, equals the inverse of the righthand side of (1.8.5.10). The argument for this is that is proportional to the righthand side of (1.8.5.10). Since , it contains the inverse of (1.8.5.10). Interestingly enough, plots of the Seebeck coefficient by Jaccard & Sierro (1982) for this case also contain broad peaks in energy, where has a maximum of about unity. In this case, a proper calculation includes the fact that both C and are functions of temperature. For a review, see Mahan (1997).
We give these examples of the Seebeck coefficient because they are the cases that occur most often. In many metals, the Seebeck coefficient is either linear with temperature or has broad peaks. The broad peaks are due to structure in near the chemical potential. This structure is usually due either to variations in the density of states or in the electron lifetime.
In insulators, the Seebeck coefficient can become relatively large. The exact value depends upon the energy gap, the temperature and the density of impurities. This example is treated in many references, e.g. Goldsmid (1986) and Rowe (1995).
References
Goldsmid, H. J. (1986). Electronic refrigeration. London: Pion Limited.Jaccard, D. & Sierro, J. (1982). Thermoelectric power of some intermediate valence compounds. In Valence instabilities, edited by P. Wachter & H. Boppart, pp. 409–413. Amsterdam: NorthHolland.
Mahan, G. D. (1997). Good thermoelectrics. In Solid state physics, Vol. 51, edited by H. Ehrenreich & F. Spaepen, pp. 81–157. New York: Academic Press.
Rowe, D. M. (1995). Editor. CRC handbook of thermoelectrics. New York: CRC Press.