International
Tables for Crystallography Volume F Crystallography of biological macromolecules Edited by M. G. Rossmann and E. Arnold © International Union of Crystallography 2006 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. F, ch. 2.1, pp. 59-60
Section 2.1.7. Calculation of electron density^{a}Laboratory of Biophysical Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands |
In equation (2.1.4.6), the wave (S) scattered by the crystal is given as the sum of the atomic contributions, as in equation (2.1.4.5) for the scattering by a unit cell. In the derivation of equation (2.1.4.5), it is assumed that the atoms are spherically symmetric (Section 2.1.4.3) and that density changes due to chemical bonding are neglected. A more exact expression for the wave scattered by a crystal, in the absence of anomalous scattering, is
The integration is over all electrons in the crystal. is the electron-density distribution in each unit cell. The operation on the electron-density distribution in equation (2.1.7.1) is called Fourier transformation, and is the Fourier transform of . It can be shown that is obtained by an inverse Fourier transformation:
In contrast to is not a continuous function but, because of the Laue conditions, it is only different from zero at the reciprocal-lattice points . In equation (2.1.4.6), is the product of the structure factor and three delta functions. The structure factor at the reciprocal-lattice points is F(h), and the product of the three delta functions is , the volume of one reciprocal unit cell. Therefore, in equation (2.1.7.2) can be replaced by , and equation (2.1.7.2) itself by
If x, y and z are fractional coordinates in the unit cell, and an alternative expression for the electron density is
Instead of expressing F(S) as a summation over the atoms [equation (2.1.4.5)], it can be expressed as an integration over the electron density in the unit cell:
Because is a vector in the Argand diagram with an amplitude and a phase angle ,and
By applying equation (2.1.7.6), the electron-density distribution in the unit cell can be calculated, provided values of and are known. From equation (2.1.6.1), it is clear that can be derived, on a relative scale, from after a correction for the background and absorption, and after application of the Lorentz and polarization factor:
Contrary to the situation with crystals of small compounds, it is not easy to find the phase angles for crystals of macromolecules by direct methods, although these methods are in a state of development (see Part 16 ). Indirect methods to determine the protein phase angles are:
From equation (2.1.7.5), it is clear that the reflections and have the same value for their structure-factor amplitudes, , and for their intensities, , but have opposite values for their phase angles, , assuming that anomalous dispersion can be neglected. Consequently, equation (2.1.7.6) reduces toor denotes that is excluded from the summation and that only the reflections , and not , are considered.
The two reflections, and , are called Friedel or Bijvoet pairs.
If anomalous dispersion cannot be neglected, the two members of a Friedel pair have different values for their structure-factor amplitudes, and their phase angles no longer have opposite values. This is caused by the contribution to the anomalous scattering (Fig. 2.1.7.1). Macromolecular crystals show anomalous dispersion if the structure contains, besides the light atoms, one or more heavier atoms. These can be present in the native structure or are introduced in the isomorphous replacement technique or in MAD analysis.