International
Tables for Crystallography Volume H Powder diffraction Edited by C. J. Gilmore, J. A. Kaduk and H. Schenk © International Union of Crystallography 2018 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2018). Vol. H, ch. 2.5, p. 132
Section 2.5.3.3.6. Sample absorption^{a}Bruker AXS Inc., 5465 E. Cheryl Parkway, Madison, WI 53711, USA |
The absorption of X-rays by the sample reduces the diffracted intensity. Many approaches are used to calculate and correct the absorption effect for various sample shapes and geometries [International Tables for Crystallography Volume C, Chapter 6.3 (Maslen, 1992); Ross, 1992; Pitschke et al., 1996; Zuev, 2006]. The sample absorption can be measured by the transmission coefficient (also referred to as the absorption factor):where A is the transmission coefficient, μ is the linear absorption coefficient and τ is the total beam path in the sample, which includes the incident-beam path and diffracted-beam path. Fig. 2.5.15(a) shows reflection-mode diffraction with a flat-plate sample. The thickness of the plate is t. z is the distance of the element dV from the sample surface. The normal to the reflection surface is n. The incident beam is represented by the unit vector s_{o} and the diffracted beam by the unit vector s. The transmission coefficient is given as (Maslen, 1992 )where η is the angle between the incident beam and the normal to the sample surface, and ζ is the angle between the diffracted beam and the sample normal. For two-dimensional X-ray diffraction, there is a single incident-beam direction at a time, but various diffracted-beam directions simultaneously, soand
The transmission coefficient from equation (2.5.33) contains a length unit, which creates ambiguity if such transmission coefficients are used to correct the intensity pixel-by-pixel. In order to make the relative intensity comparable to the results from Bragg–Brentano geometry, we introduce a new transmission coefficient, which is normalized by the transmission coefficient of the Bragg–Brentano geometry, . This normalized transmission coefficient is also a numerical factor without units. The transmission coefficient with normalization will be denoted by T hereafter in this chapter. The transmission coefficient for reflection-mode diffraction with a flat sample of thickness t is then given asFor a thick plate or material with a very high linear absorption coefficient, the transmission through the sample thickness is negligible and the above equation becomesFig. 2.5.15(b) shows transmission-mode diffraction with a flat-plate sample. The thickness of the plate is t. The normal to the reflection surface is represented by the unit vector n. The incident beam is represented by the unit vector s_{o} and the diffracted beam by the unit vector s. η is the angle between the incident beam and the normal of the sample surface, and ζ is the angle between the diffracted beam and the sample normal.
The transmission coefficient normalized by is given by (Maslen, 1992 ; Ross, 1992)
For two-dimensional X-ray diffraction in transmission modeand
It is very common practice to set the incident angle perpendicular to the sample surface, i.e. η = 0. For most transmission-mode data collection, equation (2.5.40) becomesWhen η = ζ, both the numerator and denominator approach zero, and the transmission coefficient should be given byIt is common practice to load the sample perpendicular to the incident X-ray beam at the goniometer angles . Therefore, and , and the transmission coefficient becomesThe maximum scattered intensity occurs whenThis equation can be used to select the optimum sample thickness for transmission-mode diffraction. For example, if the measurement 2θ range is between 3 and 50°, the preferred sample thickness should be given by μt = 0.8–1.0.
References
Maslen, E. N. (1992). X-ray absorption. International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. C, edited by A. J. C. Wilson, pp. 520–529. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google ScholarPitschke, W., Collazo, J. A. L., Hermann, H. & Hildenbrand, V. D. (1996). Absorption corrections of powder diffraction intensities recorded in transmission geometry. J. Appl. Cryst. 29, 561–567.Google Scholar
Ross, C. R. (1992). Measurement of powder diffraction sample absorption coefficients using monochromated radiation and transmission geometry. J. Appl. Cryst. 25, 628–631.Google Scholar
Zuev, A. D. (2006). Calculation of the instrumental function in X-ray powder diffraction. J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 304–314.Google Scholar